Finance Tax Time

Many people are buying a second home. They might do so to have a vacation home with the possibility of selling it at a substantial gain in the future. Another reason people buy a second home is to use it in the future as a primary home, perhaps in retirement. They might prefer to purchase the second home now to avoid the possibility of having to pay considerably more for it in the future.

What are the tax benefits and potential tax pitfalls in purchasing a second home? The first benefit is that the real estate taxes on a second home are deductible as an itemized deduction. However, a potential pitfall exists if the taxpayer is subject to the alternative minimum tax (AMT). Real real estate taxes are not deductible for AMT purposes.

The mortgage interest is also deductible as an itemized deduction on mortgage loans up to a maximum of $1,000,000 on loans used to acquire, construct, or substantially improve the taxpayer’s primary home and the taxpayer’s second qualified home. A refinancing of acquisition debt is considered acquisition debt to the extent that it does not exceed the balance before refinancing.

Another tax benefit for owning a second home is that the taxpayer may deduct interest on home-equity loans up to a maximum loan amount of $100,000. A home-equity loan is considered as an acquisition debt if the taxpayer uses it to make a substantial improvement to the primary home or second home. The loans may be secured by the primary residence and/or the second home. For tax purposes, a home-equity loan includes the excess of the balance of a refinanced acquisition loan over the balance before the refinancing unless the taxpayer uses the excess to make a substantial improvement to the home.

A tax pitfall is that the interest on a home-equity loan is generally not deductible for AMT purposes. An exception applies if the taxpayer uses the proceeds of the loan of the loan to make a substantial improvement to the property.

If a taxpayer rents a second home to a tenant for 14 or fewer days during the year, the rent income is not taxable. The taxpayer may still deduct the real estate taxes. The taxpayer may deduct the qualified mortgage interest as long as the taxpayer used the second home for personal purposes for a number of days that exceeds the greater of 14 days or 10 percent of the number of days the taxpayer rented the house to a tenant at a fair rental. If the taxpayer does not meet this test, the second home might be considered as rental property.

A potential tax pitfall on a second home is that any gain on the sale of a home that is not the taxpayer’s principal residence is taxable. It would be taxable as a capital gain because a personal use asset such as a second home is a capital asset.

The exclusion of gain up to $250,000 ($500,000 on a joint return) on the sale of the taxpayer’s home applies only to the sale of a home that that the taxpayer owned and used as the taxpayer’s principal residence for at least two of the five years before its sale. A taxpayer may have only one principal residence at a time.

A taxpayer could sell the primary home and exclude the gain up to the limit and then move into the second home and use it as a primary residence for at at least two of the five years before the taxpayer sells it. By doing so, the taxpayer could use the exclusion of gain provision on both homes. The potential to exclude the gain on the sale of both homes up to the limit using this strategy is a major tax benefit.

Another potential tax pitfall on owning a second home is that any loss on the sale of a home used as the taxpayer’s residence, whether as a primary home or as a second home, is not deductible because the loss is on the sale of an asset used for personal purposes.

An individual should consider many factors before buying a second home, such as cost, convenience, and potential gain. The tax benefits and potential tax pitfalls are some other key factors to consider before buying a second home.

Alan D. Campbell is a CPA in Arkansas and Florida and is self-employed primarily as an author of tax publications. He earned a Ph.D. in accounting with an emphasis in taxation from the University of North Texas. He is also admitted to practice before the United States Tax Court. He has published numerous articles on tax topics in professional journals. He is the co-author of the book Tax Strategies for the Self-Employed and the revision editor of CCH Financial and Estate Planning Guide, 15th edition. For more tax savings strategies, please see his blog: http://taxsavingsstrategies.blogspot.com

Share This

Filed under: Tax Infomation by admin
No Comments »

A point on a mortgage loan is one percentage point of the loan. For example, two points on a $200,000 mortgage loan would be $4,000 ($200,000 x 2%). Points represent prepaid interest.

A taxpayer who uses the cash method of accounting may deduct points paid on a loan to buy or improve a principal residence as long as the points are a normal business practice in the area, are reasonable in amount, and the loan is secured by the residence (Sections 163(h)(3)(B) and 461(g)(2)). Interest, including points, on a loan to acquire or improve the taxpayer’s residence is limited to the interest on the first $1,000,000 of the mortgage loan.

The limit on deductibility of interest on a loan to acquire a residence applies to the taxpayer’s principal residence and one other residence (Section 163(h)(4)(A). However, a taxpayer may deduct points paid in the year paid only in connection with a mortgage loan on the taxpayer’s primary residence (Section 461(g)(2)). If a taxpayer pays points on a mortgage loan to purchase a second home, the taxpayer must amortize the points over the life of the loan.

A taxpayer claims the deduction on Schedule A of Form 1040. A buyer may deduct the points even if the seller pays them (Rev. Proc. 94-27, 1994-1 CB 613). A taxpayer who uses the accrual basis of accounting must amortize the points over the life of the loan.

If a taxpayer pays points on a home equity loan, the taxpayer may not deduct the points immediately unless the taxpayer uses the proceeds of the home equity loan to improve the property. If the taxpayer does not use the proceeds of a home equity loan to improve the property, the taxpayer must amortize the points over the life of the loan (Sections 163(h)(3)(C) and 461(g)(1)).

The deduction of interest, including points, on a home equity loan is limited to the interest on a home equity loan up to $100,000 unless the taxpayer uses the home equity loan for business purposes. If the taxpayer pays the loan off early, the taxpayer may deduct the unamortized points in the year paid (Temp. Regs. Sec. 1.163-10T(j)(3)).

The same rule that applies to a home equity loan also generally applies to a refinancing of a taxpayer’s mortgage loan. The taxpayer may not deduct the points immediately. The taxpayer must amortize the points over the life of the loan. If the taxpayer pays the loan off early, the taxpayer may deduct the unamortized points in the year paid.

However, for taxpayers who live under the jurisdiction of the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, if the taxpayer pays points on a mortgage loan and uses the proceeds to pay off a short-term bridge loan, the taxpayer may deduct the points in the year paid (Huntsman v. Commissioner, 90-2 USTC Para. 50,340, CA-8, 1990, rev’g 91 TC 917). The U. S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has jurisdiction over taxpayers in the states of Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota.

If a taxpayer pays points on a mortgage loan to acquire undeveloped land, a commercial building, or rental real estate, the taxpayer must amortize the points over the life of the loan. If the taxpayer pays the loan off early, including a sale of the property, the taxpayer may deduct the unamortized points in the year paid.

Taxpayers should remember to deduct points paid in connection with a mortgage loan to purchase or improve their principal residence, whether the purchaser or seller pays the points. For points paid in connection with a refinancing of a mortgage, to obtain a home equity loan, or to obtain a mortgage loan on rental or commercial property, taxpayers should remember to deduct the points over the life of the loan and deduct the unamortized points in the year the taxpayer pays the loan.

Alan D. Campbell is a CPA in Arkansas and Florida and is self-employed primarily as an author of tax publications. He earned a Ph.D. in accounting with an emphasis in taxation from the University of North Texas. He is also admitted to practice before the United States Tax Court. He has published numerous articles on tax topics in professional journals. He is the co-author of the book Tax Strategies for the Self-Employed and the revision editor of CCH Financial and Estate Planning Guide, 15th edition. For more tax savings strategies, please see his blog: http://taxsavingsstrategies.blogspot.com

Share This

Filed under: Tax Infomation by admin
No Comments »

A new business owner incurs start-up costs before beginning the business. Under Section 195(c)(1), start-up costs are costs the taxpayer incurs to investigate the creation or acquisition of a business or in creating a business. The costs must be costs that would be deductible as an ordinary and necessary business expense if the taxpayer was actively conducting the business.

In general, a taxpayer may not deduct start-up costs until the taxpayer sells the business. That is the default rule of Section 195(a). However, for start-up costs paid or incurred after October 22, 2004, a taxpayer may elect to deduct start-up costs to the extent allowed by Section 195(b)(1)(A). Under Section 195(d)(1), a taxpayer has until the due date of the tax return, including extensions, to make the election.

A taxpayer makes the election by claiming the deduction on the appropriate form. For example, a taxpayer who is a sole proprietor would claim the deduction on Schedule C of Form 1040. The taxpayer should attach a statement to the form showing the start-up costs for which the taxpayer is making the election.

If a taxpayer failed to make the election when the taxpayer filed a timely tax return, the taxpayer has six months to file an amended return and make the election under Regulations Section 301.9100-2(b). The IRS has no authority for allowing any other late elections.

If the taxpayer elects to deduct start-up costs, the taxpayer may deduct up to $5,000 of startup costs in the year the taxpayer begins the active conduct of the business. However, if the start-up costs exceed $50,000, the $5,000 limit on the deduction for start-up costs is reduced by the amount by which start-up costs exceed $50,000.

For example, assume that the start-up costs are $52,000. The taxpayer may claim an immediate deduction of $3,000 [$5,000 - ($52,000 - $50,000)]. If the start-up costs are $55,000 or more, the taxpayer may not deduct any of the start-up costs in the year the taxpayer begins the active conduct of the business except as an amortization deduction as explained below.

The taxpayer may deduct the remaining start-up costs ratably over 180 months beginning in the month in which the taxpayer begins the active conduct of the business under Section 195(b)(2). For example assume that a taxpayer’s start-up costs were $23,000. The taxpayer may deduct $5,000 immediately. In addition, the taxpayer deducts the remaining $18,000 of start-up costs at the rate of $100 a month [($23,000 - $5,000) / 180].

The ratable deduction of start-up costs over 180 months is called an amortization deduction. A taxpayer claims an amortization deduction on Form 4562 and then carries the total deductions on Form 4562 to the appropriate form.

If the taxpayer sells the business before deducting all of the start-up costs, the taxpayer may deduct the remaining start-up costs as a loss as allowed by Sections 165 and 195(b)(2).

A taxpayer should take advantage of these rules to ensure the highest possible tax deductions. Because the time for making the election is quite limited, a taxpayer should be sure to make the election in a timely manner.

Alan D. Campbell is a CPA in Arkansas and Florida and is self-employed primarily as an author of tax publications. He earned a Ph.D. in accounting with an emphasis in taxation from the University of North Texas. He is also admitted to practice before the United States Tax Court. He has published numerous articles on tax topics in professional journals. He is the co-author of the book Tax Strategies for the Self-Employed and the revision editor of CCH Financial and Estate Planning Guide, 15th edition. For more tax savings strategies, please see his blog: http://taxsavingsstrategies.blogspot.com

Share This

Filed under: Finance-Tax Detail by admin
No Comments »